Deceitful Spammer or Marketing Genius?
By Jessica Silliman
Rachel Bailey was quickly hired out of Santa Clara University
during the dot-com boom to a company of 100 employees that ran
an innovative social networking website in Silicon Valley. She
was immediately put in charge of email communication to customers-both
existing and potential.
The Internet was quite new to everyone and online communication
(via email) had little corporate regulation or set social protocol.
Privacy policies were yet to be established. With thousands
of individuals discovering the Internet everyday, business was
booming for the small Silicon Valley firm.
Rachel handled all online contact with existing users and was
asked to market to these existing online community members via
email. But she struggled with finding a balance of the right
amount of marketing. With Internet competition growing everyday
within the social networking websites, these users had plenty
of alternatives. And flooding their email inboxes, she thought,
wasn't the best way to attract them.
Unfortunately, Rachel's boss had a different approach. The
Vice President of Marketing wanted results-he wanted existing
customers to upgrade their networking packages and follow through
on advertisements. He told Rachel to be as aggressive as possible
with her email campaigns. But at the same time, Rachel spoke
with coworkers who didn't want to work for a company known for
its email spam. They prided themselves on working at an organization
that respected its users and didn't abuse the ease of email
communication-even within the competitive market.
Rachel found subtle alternatives to the mass emails. She developed
links on the company website to advertisements, but she wasn'
t getting the results her boss demanded.
One day when Rachel arrived at the office, her boss said he
had a brilliant idea. He said that everybody knew someone named
Cindy Anderson, so they could send emails to their users from
that name to trick them into opening the email, which would
display a link to their website.
Rachel was incensed with her boss's idea. "A lot of people
are very casual with the truth," she said.
Rachel felt very uncomfortable with the thought of implementing
what she considered to be her boss's deceptive idea.
"People trust you with their email addresses," said
Rachel. "You have to be responsible and not take advantage
of that access."
She worried that existing customers would begin to resent the
company and unsubscribe. But she also had a commitment to drawing
in as many new customers as she could-and her more subtle tactics
Rachel made the decision to stand up to her boss. The following
week she told him that his idea was deceitful and would cause
customers to lose trust and faith in the company. In the end,
it wouldn't be a financially viable solution to their problem.
Rachel proved to be convincing. Her boss took her advice and
began to realize that it was a bad idea.
"In the end, we had happy customers and our company gained
more value in the highly competitive market," said Rachel.
- Describe the ethical dilemma or dilemmas Rachel faced.
- Do you think Rachel's boss' "Cindy Anderson" strategy
is ethically acceptable? Why or why not?
- What is Rachel's obligation to her customers and what are
Rachel 's obligations to the company?
- What do you think is the most important factor in how Rachel
responded to the situation: That she thought the proposed
"Cindy Anderson" strategy was deceitful or that
she thought the strategy would cost the company customers?
Jessica Silliman was a 2006-07 Hackworth Fellow at The Markkula
Center for Applied Ethics.