- Ethics Home Page
- About the Center
- Focus Areas
- Contact Us
- Site Index
Pondering Your Worst Nightmare to Aid Ethical Decision-Making
By Margaret Steen
The titles of Boris Feldman's slides are enough to send shivers down the spine of any corporate ethics or compliance officer: "Sex." "Whistleblowing." "Foreign Payments."
At the Business and Organizational Ethics Partnership at Santa Clara University's Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, Feldman helped participants explore the ethical problems that can arise in these and other areas. Feldman is a partner at the law firm Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, who specializes in securities litigation and counseling, SEC enforcement actions, and M&A litigation. His talk was entitled, "Your Worst Nightmare: Ethical Hypotheticals for the In-House Ethics & Compliance Team."
Feldman started by listing three "Principles of Survival," followed by three defenses.
The survival principles, Feldman said, will help keep a company out of trouble:
When a problem does arise, Feldman listed three best defenses:
Feldman walked participants through a series of hypothetical questions: If your friend tells you confidentially that he or she is in a relationship with another employee at the company, do you have an obligation to investigate or report this? Does the situation change if your friend is the CEO? If one or both of the parties is married? If they travel together on company business?
Feldman said this is often not a legal issue and can be dealt with by the Human Resources Department; in many cases, it would be good to encourage the friend to let the HR department know. He also noted that when company expense reports are involved, that raises the stakes: "I've seen boards fire people for this, saying, 'If you want to have an affair, don't do it on our nickel.'"
Another scenario: What do you do if you learn that a person in China who works for a third party affiliated with your company has made payments to procure business? Do you report this to the SEC or to the Department of Justice?
Feldman noted that many companies, having seen the failures of internal legal departments to identify problems at Enron and other companies, are now very quick to hand off investigations such as these to outside counsel. However, he said, "this is the bread and butter of the compliance person." That internal person should immediately contact the chair of the Audit Committee on the board, but it may well be something the internal compliance officer can investigate. Outside investigations can rack up large bills very quickly, and they are not always necessary.
Margaret Steen is a freelance writer.
- Engineering Ethics Prize
Applications due April 17
- Cultivating Compassion
Psychologist discusses his work with Israeli and Palestinian youth, April 22
- Religious Liberty and the Culture Wars
A talk by UVA Law Professor Douglas Laycock, April 29
Competition for students to create app or program on social justice, May 2
- More News »