- Ethics Home Page
- Focus Areas
- Contact Us
- Site Index
Owning Up To Racial Disparities
The U.S. Census Bureau has documented a tenfold difference between the wealth of white and African American families during the 1980s and 1990s. Santa Clara University Associate Professor of Law Margalynne Armstrong is investigating the role of law and property in creating this disparity.
With help from a Markkula Center for Applied Ethics grant, Armstrong is researching various approaches to property ownership generated from within the African American community, from rent parties to income sharing.
Property ownership is an ethical issue, she says, because it "has a profound effect on the ability of minorities to participate in the civic life of the country."
Originally, ideals of U.S. citizenship were tied to property, Armstrong points out. "The founders had a concept of citizens as invested in society, and part of that investment was based on the ownership of property," she explains.
Armstrong believes property still functions as a powerful way to tie people to the future of their communities; not owning property, on the other hand, can preclude participation in important decisions.
As an example, Armstrong points to the California law that allows cities and towns to vote whether low-income housing will be built in their communities. If those cities are made up primarily of single-family, individually owned houses, those who do not own property will not live in these communities and, thus, will not have a voice in the decision. Since nonowners comprise households disproportionately headed by women, African Americans, and immigrants, such exclusion has the most severe impact on these groups.
In addition to her research, Armstrongwith Philip Kain, chair of the SCU Philosophy Department, and Calvin Stewart, professor of philosophyis a discussion leader for the Center's Racism Study Group, which brings faculty and staff together for a cross-disciplinary look at current research in the field.
"There's usually at least one person who has a very different take on what's being read than I do," she says. "It's very enriching."
|Issues in Ethics - V. 8, N. 1 Winter 1997|
|Bringing Ethics Home|
|life and death with dignity|
|An Editor's Note|
|Aid in Dying|
|Confronting the Ultimate Questions|
|The Law of Advance Directives|
|a case in point|
|The Case of the Depressed Patient|
|Comments on the Case of the Sole-Remaining Supplier|
|ethics at work|
|From Synchilla to School Support|
|Time to Go Home|
|The Tie That Binds|
|a good read|
|Spiritual Paths to Virtue|
|letters to the editor|
|Punishing the Innocent|
|scholars at work|
|Margalynne Armstrong: Owning up to Racial Disparities|
|news from the center|
|Corporate Ethics Roundtable|
|Goodbye Claire, and Thanks|
|Managed Care: Exploring Costs, Promoting Value|
|issues in ethics tools|