Herman Wildman Social Justice Writing Award
2009 Herman Wildman Social Justice Writing Award
The Herman Wildman Social Justice Writing Award will be given to the best student essay on a Public Interest and Social Justice Law topic. Students are encouraged to submit papers written for a class, law review, or other forum from the 2008 Spring Semester through the 2008-09 academic year.
The Herman Wildman Social Justice Writing Award honors the memory of Herman Wildman, 1912-2002, who practiced law in New York and California. The winner receives an honorarium and a plaque.
Papers will be judged by faculty members on the Public Interest and Social Justice Law Advisory Board who did not supervise the writing project.
Submissions should include the following:
- An application form (DOC);
- Three copies of your essay with no name identification;
- The name of the writing supervisor or course instructor. If you had no supervisor or course instructor, please explain;
- Your contact information;
- Optional: a nomination letter from the writing supervisor or course instructor.
Please submit your work for consideration for this award by noon on April 29, 2009, to the Center for Social Justice and Public Service, Loyola Hall, 425 El Camino Real.
Herman Wildman, 1912-2002, was born in New York City, attended City College of New York, and graduated from St. John's University School of Law. He was honorably discharged from the U.S. Army after serving in World War II with the 88th Infantry "Blue-Devil" Division. As a member of the New York bar, he practiced with the law offices of George J. Mintzer, which included associates Thomas J. Todarelli and Hubert T. Delaney. He became a member of the California bar in 1953, where he continued his work as a general practitioner in solo practice in Los Angeles. He was married for 55 years to Edith Wildman and had three children.
2008 Recipient
Abdul Al Hamamsy
Avian Influenza Pandemic: A Comprehensive Preparedness Plan for a National Security Threat
The topic of this paper is a global preparedness plan for an avian influenza (H5N1) pandemic. Abdul stresses the importance of Congressional action to cooperate with the World Health Organization according to its new International Health Regulations, which gave the WHO unprecedented legal powers.
2007 Recipient
Jennifer Alesio
Reconceptualizing Although I Do Not Hope: Evaluating Revolutionary Educational Reform in the Era of Retrenchment
This paper evaluates three distinct and dramatic remedies to educational inequality, magnet schools, New Jersey's "Abbott Districts" and the Harlem Children's Zone. Two of these reforms altered the mechanism of education, and one is altering the premise of education.
2007 Honorable Mention
Olivia Serene Lee
Making the Case to Desegregate Public Schools in a Time of Resegregation: A San Franciscan Chinese American Perspective
Using a critical race theory approach to explain the circumstances that let to the current trend of resegregation among San Francisco public schools, this paper explores a school admission program that the San Francisco public school system can adopt to address this problem. One of the key components to the proposed program is the adoption of race as a factor in school admissions, which would require the school system to consider several legal hurdles: strict scrutiny analysis, Proposition 209, and the settlement agreement of Ho v. San Francisco Unified School District. After analyzing these hurdles, this paper concludes that the proposed program is likely to be valid if contested.
2006 Recipient
Pami Vyas
Reconceptualizing Domestic Violence in India: Economic Abuse and the Need for Broad Statutory Interpretation to Promote Women's Fundamental Rights
This paper explores the reconceptualization of domestic violence in India through an analysis of the economic abuse provision of the recently passed Domestic Violence Act. Although India has taken a significant step towards advancing women's rights by characterizing economic abuse as a form of domestic violence, effective implementation of the law requires a broad interpretation of the economic abuse provision.
2006 Honorable Mention
Pamela Vartabedian
The Need to Hold Batterers Accountable: Admitting Prior Acts of Abuse in Cases of Domestic Violence
The current schemes in the majority of state evidence codes do no adequately protect domestic violence victims. Only two states, California and Alaska, have adopted legislation allowing propensity evidence in domestic violence cases. In order to hold batterers accountable, states must adopt evidence rules that admit evidence of prior acts of domestic violence for propensity purposes.
2005 Recipient
Jennifer Briggs
Protecting Pregnant Workers: Anti-Discrimination Law and Specific Rights in Europe and the United States
This paper analyzes the evolution of laws and policies aimed at protecting pregnant workers. It compares the "equality" versus "difference" approaches in both Europe and the United States. Finally, This paper advocates for a "specific rights" approach to protecting pregnant women in the workplace.
2004 Recipient
Susan Hunt
Feminism of the Future: Unmodified or Unified?
This paper explores the further development of feminist theory and its potential to evolve into a theory to address all forms of subordination. The author maintains that feminist theory needs to develop beyond the limitations of rigid categorical approaches. However, a unified theory does not mean that women must fit into a uniform pattern.
2004 Honorable Mention
Kirsten Bowman
Bridging the Gap in the Hopes of Ending Female Genital Cutting
2003 Recipients
Stephanie Grogan
Liberty v. Security: Does Security Always Win or Can They Co-Exist During Times of War?
Constitutional rights and civil liberties have been eroded because of the government’s "War on Terrorism." Examining this theme in the context of lower court cases infringing the rights of citizens and non-citizens deemed "enemy combatants" or "enemies," this paper focuses on the implications of the Administration position in these cases and the dangers posed to individual rights.
Dori Lynn Yob
Mistaken Identifications Cause Wrongful Convictions: New Jersey's Lineup Guidelines Restore Hope, But Are They Enough?
Mistaken eyewitness identification is the leading cause of wrongful conviction in the United States, often because of bias in the lineup procedure. Critiquing recent lineup guidelines adopted in New Jersey, this paper proposes the adoption of "Miranda-like" guidelines.
2002 Recipient
Christine Carlson
Invisible Victims: Holding the Educational System Liable for Teen Dating Violence at School
Despite the documented presence of dating violence in many teens’ lives and the increased emphasis on curbing teen violence in schools, middle and high schools as a whole do not educate their student populations about dating violence even though there are strong parallels between teen dating violence and teen violence generally. Schools legally have the ability to control their students’ behavior, and a school’s failure to do so can result in legal liability in specifically defined situations and circumstances. The article reviews cases in which both state and federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have held schools and districts liable for student harassment and student-on-student violence and outlines several options school districts should consider to avoid liability for teen dating violence.