Why is the public list sharing ideas for the project organized alphabetically?
April 28, 2017
We spent a great deal of time considering the best way to present the public list of ideas to the campus community. We found that none of the scenarios were ideal in attempting to share such a large amount of disparate information. In the end, we chose an alphabetized list as the best course of action.
This decision is driven by a few reasons. First, we are dealing with an extremely tight timetable in this process and a high priority was to provide the campus community with as much time to review as possible. Publishing them as we have has enabled us to provide a two week window for review. Any other format would have dramatically shortened that already tight window.
In addition, this process was dependent upon the creation of an open space for the working groups to discuss big ideas without fear of repercussions. In order to accomplish this, it was vital that the source of ideas not be made public. Organizing the list alphabetically was key to ensuring this anonymity.
Finally, we attempted to merge together and avoid duplication where possible, though we know it is imperfect. A key value for us was to present the information in its original format whenever possible for the campus community to see as authentically as possible where the project is in its current state.
We understand this format has its challenges. We also feel as though it is the best option and are hopeful the campus community can navigate the list and provide feedback as many community members already have thus far.
Michael Nuttall, Project point person on communications
Lisa Kloppenberg, Co-Chair
Tom Plante, Co-chair