Commentary on Immigration Ethics
Ethically speaking, immigrants who have credible fears of persecution or torture should have a right to a bond hearing in front of an immigration judge and should not be indefinitely detained.
Navigating the controversial debates in immigration ethics through the three lenses: nationalism, cosmopolitanism, and democracy.
The labels we use to refer to different classes of individuals are not merely neutral descriptors but often implicitly come with various associations or value judgments, which can, in turn, frame and influence political debates.
Economics and ethics partner to help make the case for increased immigration.
In reality, the “Remain in Mexico” program is a way for the U.S. government to avoid adjudicating the claims of asylum seekers in the first place and to keep the violations of their basic human rights out of sight and out of mind to the U.S. public.
The ethical basis for politically recognizing someone as a citizen lies simply in the fact that they are already members of our society.
Prioritizing dignity over detachment in ethical journalism practice.
For some children, family separation also means no communication.
The United States is one of 33 countries, including Canada, that recognize citizenship based on place of birth.
What are the ethical considerations?