Skip to main content

Reporting Inflated Numbers

Jessica Silliman

Barbara King graduated from Santa Clara University at the perfect time. It was the peak of the dot-com boom and businesses were competing for recent graduates. Barbara had no problem getting her first job in the high-tech industry as a corporate communications specialist.

Many of her friends struggled when entering the corporate world, but Barbara didn't have any problems. The workplace had a casual atmosphere, she enjoyed a salary far above that of her friends, she received perks regularly and she enjoyed Mai-Tai Fridays at the office every week.

She was at the job for less than two months when the company released the quarterly numbers. As the internal communications representative, Barbara was responsible for reporting the numbers to all the employees within the company. Because the company was not publicly traded, only those within the organization were privy to the information.

"I was aware something wasn't quite right with the numbers," said Barbara. "But I was so young and naive-I never thought they could be wrong." She knew the company was doing well, but Barbara had been tracking the high-tech industry and was conscious of the usual financial targets. She also knew that the industry was getting out of control and each company was willing to do anything to get ahead. After asking her coworkers, she realized that they all knew the numbers were intentionally inflated every quarter. Barbara took the hints from her coworkers and passed the numbers on without question.

"We were a young company and we needed our stock price to rise so that we could stay competitive in the booming industry," said Barbara. "Everyone questioned the numbers, but, because of the hip work culture that everyone enjoyed and the potential for riches, there was an underlying pressure to be loyal."

The inflated numbers became another part of the culture. Barbara observed coworkers laughing when they picked up the paper and read the headlines about their company's booming quarter.

"Everyone was just enjoying the ride and didn't want it to end," said Barbara. "Venture capitalists were practically throwing money at our company and we were spending it faster than we thought possible."

"I was new at the company, was making great money and had great benefits-why would I jeopardize all of that?" said Barbara.

Discussion Questions:

  • How would you describe the fundamental ethical dilemma that Barbara faces?
  • Who benefits by Barbara passing on the incorrect information? Who is harmed by her doing so?
  • Do you think Barbara handled this situation correctly? Would you handle it differently?

Jessica Silliman was a 2006-07 Hackworth Fellow at The Markkula Center for Applied Ethics.

June 2007

Jun 1, 2007

Center News

  • Event to focus on California's new End of Life Option Law

    All are welcome to attend July 30 free seminar in Lincoln

    Center Director of Bioethics McLean will be a featured panelist at a seminar entitled "Right to Die" in Lincoln, CA, on July 30 at 10:30 am. She will focus on ethical issues in death and dying.

  • Campaign Ethics Online Course Opens July 5

    Join Director of Government Ethics Callaghan and expert panel

    Participants will receive practical tips on setting an ethical tone, ethical decision-making, ethical operations, and using campaign ethics to their advantage.